View a PDF of the paper titled (Mis)generalization of Helpful-Only Fine-tuning, by Mohammad Omar Khursheed and 2 other authors
Abstract:Helpful-only models, that is, models that are trained to always follow user intent, are valuable for dangerous capability evaluations and other areas of AI R&D where refusals would be an obstacle. Little is known about the generalization properties of helpful-only training: helpful-only models refuse less than their harmless counterparts, but previous work has not studied other dimensions of their alignment. We study the shortcomings of existing helpful-only models. We find that some show emergent misalignment, others have residual refusal behaviors, and most show poor steerability, sycophancy, and incoherent character. We show that simple anti-refusal training can cause many of these issues. None of these problems are necessary consequences of helpful-only training, though: we show that synthetic document fine-tuning and adding character-related questions to SFT and RL can mitigate them.
Submission history
From: Mohammad Omar Khursheed [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 3 Jun 2026 03:43:08 UTC (2,315 KB)
[v2]
Fri, 6 Nov 2026 05:07:26 UTC (2,393 KB)
![[2606.04413] (Mis)generalization of Helpful-Only Fine-tuning [2606.04413] (Mis)generalization of Helpful-Only Fine-tuning](https://techwavedispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/260604413-Misgeneralization-of-Helpful-Only-Fine-tuning-1024x597.png)