arXiv:2611.14594v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Adversarial Machine Learning research is currently centered on the search for the epsilon-ball: minimal perturbations designed to fool models while remaining imperceptible to humans. We argue that this fixation on $\ell_p$ norms is a metrological trap that communicates a distorted perception of risk to defenders, one that is unaligned with real-world system vulnerabilities. This paradigm misleads defenders into optimizing for narrow, mathematical robustness at the expense of systemic security, while simultaneously incentivizing attackers to exploit non-overlapping alternative adversarial pathways. Ultimately, we argue that the dominance of the $\ell_p$ ball does not just fail to reduce harm—it may actively facilitate it by communicating a false sense of security against the wrong threats.
Trending
- An Open Reproduction of State-of-the-art Visual Langage Model
- The Impact of Age Normalisation and Subject-Independent Validation
- Making LLMs lighter with AutoGPTQ and transformers
- Whoop Humans Is A Social Network Designed For Fitness Enthusiasts
- Adversarial Risk in the Generative AI Era Necessitates Dropping the Small Epsilon Ball
- Llama 2 learns to code
- More autonomy, fewer NDAs: Volunteers have new requests for brain implant trials
- Model-Free Reinforcement Learning with Replay Graphs
