Enhancing Legal Machine Translation with Structured Reasoning

View a PDF of the paper titled Reasoning Before Translation: Enhancing Legal Machine Translation with Structured Reasoning, by Aixiu An and Michael Jungo and Eloi Eynard and Mark Drenhaus and Andreas Fischer and Jean Hennebert and S\’ebastien Rumley

View PDF
HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Neural machine translation (NMT) in the legal domain is a linguistically and conceptually demanding task, primarily due to the complexity of legal language and the high level of precision it requires. The recent emergence of reasoning-capable language models opens new possibilities for tackling such challenges. They add to a set of other previously proposed techniques to enhance the translation quality, which includes supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.

In this work, we perform a comparison between these various approaches. More particularly, we evaluate small language models such as Qwen3.5 4B, Qwen3.5 9B, and Gemma 3 12B enhanced with various re-training paradigms and compare their performances against frontier reasoning models. We focus on the Swiss legal system, which — with its unique multilingual statutes — offers a particularly challenging testbed for reasoning-augmented models. Our results show that the quality of small “base” models can be greatly enhanced, and that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards can be applied to NMT in the legal domain and surpasses the translation quality of supervised fine-tuning. The performance of enhanced small models is close to the one of state-of-the-art reasoning models yet remains inferior. We also note that re-training paradigms yield diminishing returns as model size increase. The code and models are publicly available at this https URL.